Connections:
This reading by Lisa Delpit really highlighted the ways in which schools and culture interact and what should be done to fix the way we oppress any culture that isn't white. She ultimately explains that teachers must teach all students the explicit and implicit rules of power as a first step toward a more just society. As I was reading this article, I was able to make connections to other readings from this class.
First, I saw many connections to Allan Johnson's "Privilege, Power, and Difference," in this reading. Within the first few pages, I noticed how these black people that the author was using as examples, all felt the same underlying theme of being listened to but not heard. Their concerns were brushed off by their white colleagues. This invalidation of their concerns lead them to stop speaking out, making their white colleagues feel as though they must have assuaged their concerns. This is an act of oppression, and according to Johnson's article, white people hold the most power over society, making it nearly impossible for black people to rise up out of this oppression, which in the case of Delpit's article means making their voices heard.
Johnson also speaks about how white people create these rules in society which is why it is so hard for minority groups to rise out of oppression. Here, Delpit depicts the same thing in her "culture of power." She says that there are codes/rules for participating in power and these rules are a reflection of the beliefs/culture of those who already hold the power. Delpit explains that the culture of schools are based on the culture of the upper and middle classes because those are the people who are in power, the white people. Here is an article on the racial inequalities in education.
Also like Delpit, Johnson explains how white people don't like to hear about racism or be told that even if they aren't outwardly racist, they still participate in a society that gives them power. Likewise, Delpit explains that those with power are frequently less aware of it or are, at least, less willing to acknowledge its existence. As Delpit and Johnson would explain, this is a major part of the problem.
I was also able to connect this reading to Shannon Renkly and Katherine Bertolini's "Shifting the Paradigm..." as they mainly describe teaching students from an asset-based model -- teaching students based on their strengths and interests. Delpit suggests doing this as she says that students should be taught to their cultural strengths. She also provides the example of when someone she knows was working with "slow learners," and the teacher had the students analyze rap songs for underlying patterns. Once the students became experts in explaining the rules for creating a new rap song, the teacher then used these patterns to relate it to the structure of grammar and Shakespeare's plays. This is an example of asset-based learning.
In class, I would be interested to know what everyone thinks about how culture and English should be taught in schools. I found the teacher and Joey's conversation eye-opening and would love to know what everyone thought about that.
Hi Amara! Great post. I like how you matched Delpit's views with Allan Johnson's "Privilege, Power, and Difference." It's truly amazing how those who are in power are often the least aware of it. I also liked how you made note of Renkly and Bartolini, advocating for an asset-based model that treats a student's home culture as a tool for learning rather than a barrier. I think the most critical takeaway from your post is Delpit's stance on explicit rules. If a "culture of power" exists, teachers have a responsibility to teach minority students the codes of that power explicitly so they may navigate and eventually challenge the system their own selves.
ReplyDeleteHi Amara, I enjoyed reading your blog! Your point about people feeling “listened to but not heard” stood out to me. That dynamic connects so directly to what Allan G. Johnson describes in Privilege, Power, and Difference—the idea that systems of privilege operate whether or not individuals consciously intend harm. When concerns are dismissed or minimized, it allows those in power to feel as though they have responded, even when nothing structural has changed. That silence can then be misinterpreted as agreement or resolution. I think you captured that cycle well.
ReplyDeleteI also appreciated how you connected Johnson’s discussion of social rules to Lisa Delpit’s “culture of power.” The idea that the rules of school reflect the norms of those who historically hold power—white, middle- and upper-class communities—is such a crucial lens. It explains why certain communication styles, language patterns, and even behavioral expectations are treated as “neutral” or “standard” when they are actually culturally rooted.
Hi Amara! I loved reading your blog! I loved how you were able to connect this reading to Johnson's "Privilege, Power and Difference". This article was a great example of how power in a school setting can really affect students. Like you mentioned, an asset-based model is so crucial to learning, especially for minority students. Changing lessons to be based on student's strengths can really improve how they understand the topic. The example of teaching students to analyze rap songs was a great example of this.
ReplyDeleteHi Amara! For your ending question -- I think the answer is honestly very complicated. Personally, I think it'd be great to have a model that is similar to the one the Alaskan teacher did in the reading where they have 2 different types of English. One for their own community, and one that is more formal english. Anything that gets students genuinely engaged and supports their development is great to me!
ReplyDeleteHi Amara, I love your visuals here. The picture of the fence is always so symbolic in terms of representing the concept of equality vs equity. Your comparisons to Johnson are really strong here, many of Delpit's themes go hand and hand with theirs. Like you mentioned, people of color not feeling heard, and hearing those experiences are aligned with concepts mentioned by Johnson like oppression and privilege.
ReplyDeleteHi Amara, great post! Your reflection at the end of your blog made me think of what PPSD is doing in some classrooms. I learned that in some classrooms that have a lot of students that are speaking a different language at home, they have instruction in both languages. I believe this is called two-way Immersion (TWI), where it is taught 50/50 English and Spanish. All students serve as language models for one another, English speakers pick up real-world language skills from native Spanish speakers, and vice versa. This way, the program helps all students develop literacy and speaking skills in both languages in an integrated, environment. I think this is great because it allows for kids to learn about other cultures and also develop language skills.
ReplyDeleteHi Amara!
ReplyDeleteWhile reading, I also quickly connected to Privilege, Power, and Difference! I noticed the strong connection and had actually gone back to look at a few similarities with the strongest aspect being they did not feel heard/seen. That was a great connection! Johnson and Delpit seem to have a similar stance.